Studentserver

This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and acts as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model offers responses comparable to other modern large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of a similar LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the ability of these two countries to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first complimentary chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had exceeded ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share rate to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more established rivals has been explained as “upending AI”, [8] constituting “the very first chance at what is emerging as a worldwide AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be freely available for usage, modification, viewing, and designing files for constructing purposes. [13] The company reportedly intensely hires young AI scientists from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer system science field to diversify its designs’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on developing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer solely utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative artificial intelligence chatbot open source, meaning its code is easily readily available for use, adjustment, and watching. This consists of permission to gain access to and use the source code, in addition to design documents, for developing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial basic intelligence lab committed to research establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were reluctant in providing funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to create an exit in a short amount of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low rate, DeepSeek became understood as the driver for China’s AI model cost war. It was rapidly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the cost of their AI models to take on the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this also permits its innovation to prevent the most strict arrangements of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to abide by the government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical abilities rather than work experience, resulting in many brand-new hires being either current university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits individuals without any computer science background to assist its innovation understand other topics and knowledge areas, consisting of having the ability to produce poetry and carry out well on the notoriously difficult Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and accountable downstream use” for the model itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was released). It was established to complete with other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes higher than many open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the 2 Base models was likewise launched concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed equivalent performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared specialists” that are constantly queried, and “routed specialists” that might not be. They discovered this to aid with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some specialists can become overly counted on, while other experts may be hardly ever used, losing criteria. Attempting to stabilize the experts so that they are equally utilized then triggers specialists to duplicate the exact same capability. They proposed the shared professionals to learn core capabilities that are often utilized, and let the routed professionals to discover the peripheral capacities that are rarely used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit design was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was constantly upgraded during training to avoid reward hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The very first stage was trained to solve math and coding problems. This stage utilized 1 reward design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd stage was trained to be useful, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and security benefit models were trained on human preference data. The rule-based reward design was by hand configured. All skilled reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They went with 2-staged RL, since they found that RL on thinking information had “special characteristics” different from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on thinking could improve over more training actions. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller, and skilled likewise, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to assist “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of specialists (MoE) variant formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a rate of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then integrated with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math issues was calculated by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code problems was produced by a reward design trained to anticipate whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by integrating DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of mathematics and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programming, reasoning) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) information. Reasoning information was produced by “skilled designs”. Non-reasoning data was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by humans. – The “expert models” were trained by starting with an undefined base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial information created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and validate throughout thinking. Then the professional models were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert model was trained to create just artificial reasoning data in one specific domain (math, programs, logic).
– Expert models were used, rather of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based reward designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data consisting of both last benefit and chain-of-thought resulting in the final reward. The benefit model produced reward signals for both questions with objective however free-form responses, and concerns without objective responses (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was computed for math problems with a final answer (put in a box), and for shows problems by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek group performed substantial low-level engineering to accomplish efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to build up properly. They used a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They decreased the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU interaction. They decreased communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise device each specialist was on in order to prevent particular machines being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became available by means of DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it exceeded efficiency of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 issues from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached an option faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company likewise launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data produced by R1. [47]

A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant initially believes about the reasoning process in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The reasoning process and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here respond to here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they utilized no model-based benefit. All benefit functions were rule-based, “primarily” of two types (other types were not specified): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed response is correct (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format benefit was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has problems with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to address these issues and additional enhance reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL process as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency benefit” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated reasoning had an incorrect last response, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking tasks) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot supposedly addresses concerns, solves logic issues and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses substantially fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers using as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require just about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta spent developing its newest AI innovation. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at relatively very little cost has actually been recognized as potentially challenging the global dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with experts and asked him to provide opinions and ideas on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has actually highlighted prospective limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export limitations on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models subsequently “triggered market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in significant global innovation business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had actually resulted in record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are involved in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to establish American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very excellent”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed uncertainty of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to use the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interrupted the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application programs user interface (API) variation of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, uses for subjects that are thought about politically delicate for the federal government of China. For instance, the design refuses to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may at first generate a response, but then deletes it quickly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and limitations can just be eliminated to a minimal extent in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist worths” specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We securely oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are devoted to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through tranquil methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists were able to deceive DeepSeek into offering certain answers to some of these topics by asking for in its answer to switch specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and privacy

Some specialists fear that the federal government of China could utilize the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s personal privacy terms state “We keep the details we gather in secure servers located in individuals’s Republic of China … We may gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you offer to our model and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian data defense authority is seeking additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually begun a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited using DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s usage of personal information. [83]

Artificial intelligence industry in China.

Notes

^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required selecting “Deep Think enabled”, and every user might utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek delights scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world ready to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips call into question trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI model got rid of US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI model outshines Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model appears to be among the best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 efficiency”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm reveals AI chatbot” – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI design advancement highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “very impressive”: “We need to take the advancements out of China really, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘impressive'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily restricted new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale malicious attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually triggered a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, till we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of chaos”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses formidable cyber, data privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House evaluates effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.